点这里读,分享图丑得让我有点烦,但只在 X 上这样,其他都正常:interconnects.ai/p/meta-shakes-up-the-frontiers-open
博主雷达 / @natolambert
Nathan Lambert
AI研究员@natolambert
粉丝 10.6万关注 954最近同步 10/19 15:41雷达库已收录
创始人(前 Ai2 OLMo 负责人) · Trillium Labs / Interconnects
去 X 主页粉丝趋势近 30 天
近 7 天
数据积累中
情报贡献参与 0 条已上架情报 · 首发 0 条
无数据
最近帖子最多 20 条
这个命名方案真是离谱(小版本号和日期标签),而且基准测试那一步跨度很大。内置视觉能力,可能比 GLM 5.3 更强。 开源权重之王回来了?
🚀 DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 is here! Stronger benchmark performance, faster task completion, and shorter outputs than the previous version—a Pareto improvement in performance and cost. Now live on our website, app, and API. 🛠️ Optimized for @DeepSeekHarness, Tencent CodeBuddy, WorkBuddy, and more. Upgrade to DeepSeek Harness v0.2.1-rc.1 or later for the best experience with the new model. 1/4
查看被引用的帖子这看起来非常重要,因为很多人都在发推说,由于MOCOM的这项规定,中国大型开源模型的终结即将到来,但其中有一项声明意在让开源技术更容易。很大程度上取决于具体实施方式,以及“近乎自动”的批准会如何运作。
MofCom said they will have a near auto licensing regime for open-source AI that allows more rapid release it seems? "To support the development of an open-source AI innovation ecosystem, automatic licensing and other facilitation measures will apply to technology exports involving open-source releases of AI technologies, Chinese companies building and operating their own computing centers overseas, overseas chip tape-outs and fabrication, joint R&D using overseas resources, and participation in international standard-setting—essentially allowing exports to proceed immediately upon filing."
查看被引用的帖子x.com/natolambert/status/2110804665847722422
Its got all the restrictions across all license eras 1. Built with muse branding nonsense that no one followed 2. Revenue gate like kimi/glm (reasonable) 3. Restricted domains / authorized use policy 4. All of the above applies to models trained on ai outputs (maybe)
查看被引用的帖子如果它的实际表现大致和分数所显示的一样,那这款模型的采用率绝对会爆棚。这是美国首个接近前沿智能体能力的开放权重模型(GLM 5.2 + Kimi K3 是来自中国的那次阶跃式突破)。美国模型的采用率一向疯涨。
1/ muse spark open is the most capable US open-weight model to date. 816B total params, 42B active. 1M-token context. natively multimodal. built for coding and agentic work like long-horizon tasks, hard software engineering, multi-step reasoning. america! 🇺🇲
查看被引用的帖子好吧,现在我真的得写博客了 🎉
Today we’re releasing Muse Spark Open, the most capable US open-weight model to date. Built for coding and agentic work, it excels at long-horizon tasks, complex software engineering, and multi-step reasoning. Key Model Specs: → 816B total / 42B active parameters → 1M token context window → Natively multimodal across text, image, video, audio
查看被引用的帖子在a16z播客上和@lishali88的对谈来得很及时,聊了开放模型如何融入RSI动态、开放模型的价值由谁获取、如何驾驭智能体集群,以及我为什么要创办Trillium Labs。
Nathan Lambert, former post-training co-lead at the Allen Institute for AI, now launching Trillium, a nonprofit open AI lab, joins a16z's Lisha Li to discuss whether open models can really keep up with the frontier. When he tells researchers in China that an average OpenAI researcher reportedly has five thousand H100s to work with, "their jaw just falls to the floor." In his view, Chinese labs have the talent but are mostly short on compute. He also thinks the distillation story is overblown. Based on the research, he puts its edge at a few months, and says "there's a bit of cope" in thinking only American labs can build good models. A lot of frontier progress outside math and code comes down to labs buying 1) data and 2) RL environments. It's a multibillion-dollar market, and some of it is sloppy enough to teach models to reward hack. That's a big part of why Trillium exists. Nathan wants to give away the environments other people would sell, and show exactly how his team uses AI to build AI, including where the models still get stuck. His bet is that the more people can see how this works, the better prepared everyone is for what's coming. 0:55 Can open models keep up with the frontier? 2:05 What it takes to reach the frontier 3:55 Open weights and the fast-follower playbook 8:25 Chinese labs: equal talent, less compute 9:55 Why distillation is harder than it looks 14:55 Is distillation theft or competition? 16:20 The lab flywheel vs owning your weights 21:45 Can general models beat every specialist? 26:30 AI at 1% of today's cost in 4 years 27:15 The RL env boom and reward hacking 31:30 What Trillium will build in the open 35:30 Breaking into AI in the age of AI slop 38:05 Open-sourcing how AI builds AI 44:25 Why Nathan isn't pre-training 49:45 Agent swarms and why lab secrets leak 54:25 Fast takeoff vs risks already here YouTube: youtu.be/BKuK0M6oDTI @natolambert @trillium_labs @lishali88
查看被引用的帖子我们方法论里有个之前被忽略的缺口,导致数据看起来在下滑,那就是没有把本地模型(GGUF、AWQ、ONNX 等)算进去。早先这些模型很难追踪,几乎就是个舍入误差。而现在,它们正在激增。我们已经更新了流程来追踪这些模型!
We've been monitoring a decline in HuggingFace downloads across the top open LLMs we track for interconnects. It looks like there was a slight change in counting of downloads, as we saw a ~30% download rate drop for many top models, but this is continuing over time. What else do people think it may be?
查看被引用的帖子我们Trillium Labs(@trillium_labs)正在招聘多个岗位,要打造LLM的开放科学生态。目前最重要的几个招聘方向(最好能尽快入职): * 全职后训练研究员 * 熟悉主流开源库的工程师(megatron、MILES、sglang、Tinker等) * 认同使命的通才、非营利运营等 * 学生研究员 我个人目前也在为MATS面试,那会是高度契合的研究方向。 欢迎回复、发邮件、私信我等等,同时在我们网站上提交表单。 很期待组建这个团队。所有早期加入的人都会直接和我一起工作,解决各种有趣的难题,快速放大我们的影响力。
我觉得很奇怪,Anthropic 在做这件事之前,居然大张旗鼓地寻求监管帮助。希望现在能让讨论回归正轨。 更奇怪的是,他们还强调从自己有漏洞的 API 里学习有害行为存在安全风险。如果 API 不安全,那就别托管它。
Over the last few months, we’ve made significant progress in reducing the effectiveness of distillation attacks against Claude. In this post, we explain how: anthropic.com/research/distillation-defenses
查看被引用的帖子这是我迄今为止读过的关于中国大模型数据经济、以及它如何与美国同行对比的最好的一篇文章(Mercor、Surge 和 Handshake 总结为拥有最大的网络,即供给,但也有很多公司提供专门服务,形式是面向 RL 的环境)。中国的主要支出方腾讯、阿里巴巴和字节跳动,并不对应主导美国市场的 OpenAI 和 Anthropic。 中国市场可能有一种偏向,类似于他们那种“自主拥有”的心态,更多大模型构建方选择自研,比如美团、小红书和小米,而美国主要科技服务则更多建立在 API 和现有开放权重模型之上。 总的来说,看起来中国实验室在愿意为数据花钱这件事上,相对美国落后了 6–12 个月,但正在迅速赶上。 我一直听到很多关于中国 AI 行业的私下议论,但大家都神神秘秘的,所以很难把这些拼凑起来。
看来 Meta 又回到前沿了 🫡
Introducing Muse Wonder, our new family of frontier models with state of the art performance for personal and professional agentic work.
查看被引用的帖子
