博主雷达 / @billackman
Bill Ackman
金融科技投资人@billackman
粉丝 302.7万关注 1,222最近同步 10/19 09:02雷达库已收录
Pershing Square CEO · Pershing Square
去 X 主页粉丝趋势近 30 天
近 7 天
数据积累中
情报贡献参与 0 条已上架情报 · 首发 0 条
无数据
最近帖子最多 20 条
波兰应该成为欧洲其他国家的榜样。
Polska nie powtórzy błędów innych europejskich państw, nie będzie też za nie płacić. Twardo bronimy granicy przed nielegalną migracją, mamy własną politykę azylową (nie przyjmujemy wniosków), deportujemy tych, którzy łamią polskie prawo. W kwestii bezpieczeństwa będziemy bezwzględni. To usłyszeli ode mnie liderzy Europy w Brukseli.
查看被引用的帖子关于社会主义与资本主义的对比,说得好。
On my way to the office this morning, I passed a group of young people protesting, a Palestinian flag draped over their shoulders. And I asked myself a question I can't shake: why does this generation always fall into the same trap? No matter the history. No matter the context. Even the ones from wealthy families, who went to the best schools, who were dealt every good card. Always the same trap. I don't think it's stupidity. I think it's a mechanism. And a mechanism can be taken apart, piece by piece. A. The observation: everything the state touches becomes unaffordable. Look at economist Mark Perry's famous chart, the one people call "the chart of the century." It tracks US prices since 2000. At the top, what explodes: hospital services, college tuition, textbooks, childcare, housing. Increases of +100%, +150%, up to +250%, far above general inflation. At the bottom, what collapses: TVs, software, phones, toys, clothing. A TV today costs a fraction of what it did in 2000, for an infinitely better product. Look at what separates the two groups. It isn't technology. It isn't complexity. It's one variable: how much the state is involved. At the top, sectors that are subsidized, regulated, shielded from competition, where the state funds demand and blocks supply. At the bottom, sectors where companies fight every single morning to serve you better and cheaper. B. The mechanism: why it's systematic. When the state subsidizes demand without freeing supply, prices rise. Every time. Guaranteed student loans, and universities raise tuition. Housing aid plus blocked building permits, and rents skyrocket. Administered healthcare, and bureaucracy eats the budget before it ever reaches the patient. In France it's even more vicious, because the price doesn't disappear: it hides. You never see the hospital bill, you pay it through payroll contributions. You never see the cost of school, you pay it through taxes. Public spending at 57% of GDP, one of the heaviest tax burdens in the world, more than €3.4 trillion in debt. And the result? Overflowing ERs, falling PISA scores, young people who can't afford to live in the city where they work. The market didn't fail in these sectors. It was never allowed in. C. Suffering demands a culprit. A 22-year-old lives all of this in their bones. They can't find a place to live. Their degree either buries them in debt or opens no doors. The future feels blocked. That suffering is real, and I don't deny it for a second. But human beings can't stand suffering without a culprit. They need a face. A scapegoat. And this is where everything is decided: who taught them how to read the world? D. Whoever tells the story picks the villain. Schools are public. Universities are public. Culture runs on grants. Film goes through funding committees. Public broadcasting shapes the narratives. The people handing down the interpretive framework are, overwhelmingly, paid by the very system that creates the problem. Do you really think that system is going to name itself as the culprit? No. It names the capitalist. The boss. The landlord. "The rich." The multinational. The commercial West. Same role, same casting, every time. E. One lens, a thousand causes. And this brings me back to that flag. A generation taught to read every situation through a single lens, oppressor on one side, rich, Western, capitalist, oppressed on the other, will apply that lens everywhere. To housing. To climate. To conflicts on the other side of the world. The cause changes, the lens stays. That's why the trap is always the same: it's not the cause that draws them in, it's the way of thinking that was installed in them. F. The perfect inversion. Here's the irony. Capitalism is the force that drove down the price of almost everything it touched. The state is the force that blew up the price of almost everything it captured. And young people blame the first for the crimes of the second. It's like blaming the firefighter for the fire because you saw him at the scene. G. The ballot box confirms it. In the US, a few weeks out from the midterms, a large share of urban young voters is getting ready to vote Democrat for more state, more spending, more regulation. New York elected a self-described socialist mayor, carried by young voters, on promises of rent freezes and city-run grocery stores. Rent freezes, the policy that has made housing scarcer everywhere it's been tried. The cure that worsens the disease. In France, it's the same play in two acts. Part of the youth votes for the radical left, which promises more state. Another part votes for the center, which promises to "manage" the state well, and has dug the debt deeper than ever. Two different ballots, one shared assumption: the problem is the market, the solution is the state. H. The way out. These young people aren't stupid. They're right to be angry. They're just aiming at the wrong target. The day they understand that their rent, their tuition and their hospital are expensive precisely because the state runs them, their anger will change direction. They'll stop protesting against those who create. They'll start protesting against those who capture. That day, the greatest intellectual scam of our time will be over.
查看被引用的帖子前提: 激励驱动着所有人类行为。 推论: 如何摧毁一个国家: 一个庞大的社会保障和支持体系,成为那些宁愿不工作的人的磁石。 一项开放的移民政策,不筛选移民以确定他们供养自己和家人的能力和意愿。 一项开放的移民政策,不筛选对该国构成威胁的政治和/或宗教意识形态。 经济激励足够大,足以激励靠国家救济生活的移民生育大量子女,但不足以让受过教育且经济上有生产力的母亲能够辞职去组建家庭。 最受过教育和最有生产力的女性生育率下降,原因是她们推迟组建家庭,因为她们渴望和/或需要推进自己的职业生涯,以及其他原因,比如过上她们认为与自己的教育成就相符的生活和/或偿还学生债务。 大赦计划,给予非法移民公民身份和投票权,而不考虑他们的经济生产力或他们因宗教或政治意识形态对该国构成的威胁。 由于上述因素导致的人口结构变化和人口增长。 国家通过增加社会支持来回应抗议。 持续未能惩罚和追究暴力和抢劫骚乱者的责任。 由政府管理,由一个庞大且不断增长的非民选官僚机构。 政府欺诈、浪费和滥用导致预算膨胀。 反商业立法使企业难以在被 AI 颠覆的全球市场中竞争,包括限制解雇甚至表现不佳的员工。 过于繁重、在全球缺乏竞争力的企业税收。 个人税收持续增加,以筹集资金供养迅速增长的福利国家。 绝大部分税收负担落在小部分人口身上。 越来越大比例的选民不缴税并领取福利。 引入或威胁征收财富税,包括对未实现收益征税,即对纸面财富征税。 最有生产力的企业建设者和最高纳税者逃往税收更低、安全顾虑更少的国家。 越来越大比例的选民投票支持支持增加福利的候选人,以及支持有利于和/或符合不断增长的非生产性移民人口的文化和意识形态需求和愿望的法律的候选人。 反犹主义迅速抬头,而应对这种仇恨的努力不足。 国家增加借贷以资助不断增长的社会负担。 由于上述所有因素导致的主权利率上升。 由此产生的削减支出以使数学成立的需要。 日益暴力的抗议使有生产力和守法的公民的生活变得更不宜居,导致他们加速离开。 等等……
@elonmusk 这一分钟必看,他预测并解释了法国被毁的原因。
I keep going back to this interview as we watch France burn… The Far Left interviewer frame Elon and us as “Far Right” for being against exactly what is happening today. Elon’s every word was proven correct. Her view was proven wrong. The Media is the Enemy of the People.
查看被引用的帖子这就是文明终结时的样子。
🇫🇷 La alcaldía de Limoges se desploma esta noche tras haber sido incendiada. Siguen los destrozos en otras ciudades a esta hora.
查看被引用的帖子尊敬的Kornbluth校长、Gorenberg董事长: 如各位所知,昨天波士顿的一个陪审团一致裁定,@MIT 教授 Kristin Knouse 诽谤了 David Sabatini,诬告他强奸和性骚扰,并以侵权方式干预了他的合同安排,包括他在 MIT 的终身教职。 MIT 及其终身教职评审委员会正是依据 Knouse 教授的陈述,剥夺了 David 的终身教职并将他解雇。 MIT 的政策明确禁止骚扰、报复和捏造指控。诬告同事强奸和性骚扰,并以虚假借口推动其被解雇,显然违反了 MIT 的政策。 鉴于陪审团经过五年的证据开示、双方提出的大量法律动议和反动议,以及在波士顿萨福克县高等法院为期三周的庭审后作出的一致裁定: MIT 是否会剥夺 Knouse 的终身教职并将她解雇? 如果不会,为什么不会? MIT 是否会恢复 David 的终身教职,并为解雇他而道歉? 如果不会,为什么不会? 鉴于这起严重的司法不公中所发生的一切,MIT 有机会也有义务纠正这一严重错误。 至少,公众有权知道 MIT 在此案中采取了哪些行动,因为纳税人是 MIT 的主要资助者。 此致, Bill Ackman
A civil jury ruled in favor of ex-MIT scientist David Sabatini, who was accused by a younger colleague of inappropriate sexual conduct in his Cambridge research lab, and awarded him $6 million in damages. trib.al/s3v9VIX
查看被引用的帖子法国什么时候才能醒过来?
The despair of a Parisian - pleading with the feral smooth brains not to destroy her store The death rattle of Paris as western civ breathes its last gasps. Notre Dame was no accident. It was the beginning of the end.
查看被引用的帖子科学是科学身上的一个污点。
Now a jury has awarded David $6 million for defamation and tortious interference. The Boston Globe and The New York Times soon after reported the outcome. Science despite running countless negative articles shaming David is nowhere to be found today. Science repeatedly portrayed David’s efforts in court as futile or unsuccessful by emphasizing selected pretrial rulings on court motions while significant claims were still awaiting trial. Those decisions did not determine the outcome of the claims the jury has now decided. This goes beyond leaving out part of the story. Relentlessly publishing damaging allegations fuels the public shaming and online bullying of a person. That carries a responsibility to give a verdict in his favor comparable visibility—and to account for the narrative those articles helped establish. David has lived with the consequences of this coverage for years. Science owes him a prominent account of this verdict and a serious reckoning with its own role in the spectacle.
查看被引用的帖子五年前,发生了一起严重的司法不公。 故事始于2018年4月,当时David Sabatini——麻省理工学院、霍华德·休斯医学研究所(HHMI)和Whitehead研究所的科学家兼教授——与Kristin Knouse博士开始了一段双方自愿的亲密关系。Knouse博士是Whitehead研究所的一名独立实验室首席研究员。 到2020年1月,David试图结束这段关系,但Knouse显然不愿放手。当David此后开始了一段新恋情、Knouse得知后,她开始了一场秘密行动,试图通过终结他作为科学家的职业生涯来毁掉他。她的手段是用虚假的性骚扰指控及其他说法来损害他及其家人的名誉和声望,从而使他在职场无处容身。 Knouse与Ruth Lehmann博士合谋实施她毁掉Sabatini的计划。Lehmann博士当时是、现在仍然是Whitehead研究所的所长(即总裁)。 法庭上呈现的记录表明,Lehmann博士在2020年10月就向Knouse承诺她会解雇David。Lehmann博士是在对事实进行任何调查之前就向Knouse做出了这一承诺。 在承诺解雇他七个月后,即2021年3月,Lehmann博士代表Whitehead聘请了Hinckley, Allen, Snyder(HAS)律师事务所对David展开调查。到2021年7月,HAS将其结论草案分享给了MIT、HHMI和Whitehead,但没有分享给David或其律师。 2021年8月19日上午,David第一次收到了那份200多页的调查报告,以及一个日历邀请——邀请他次日与Lehmann博士、HHMI总裁以及两家机构的人力资源总监开会。这份报告充斥着关于David及其与Knouse关系的错误和无据指控。 当David的律师随即联系Whitehead的法律顾问,询问David是否即将被解雇时,对方确认他将在会上被解雇。 在律师的建议下,David立即从HHMI和Whitehead辞职,而非出席那次会议。HHMI没有接受他的辞呈,而是选择解雇他。MIT让David休假,并最终撤销了他的终身教职。David随后从MIT辞职。 2021年8月20日,也就是将HAS报告发给David的第二天,在David还没来得及对调查的事实和结论提出异议之前,Lehmann博士就向Whitehead全体员工发送邮件,告知他们David违反了Whitehead的多项政策,“包括有关性骚扰的政策”。 Lehmann的公开邮件、David的辞职和被解雇、以及Lehmann博士关于David性骚扰的说法,引爆了一场全球性的重大丑闻,被全世界的主流媒体、社交媒体和科学媒体报道,因为它具备了所有必要的要素: 一个极具吸引力的目标——David,他那一代最重要的科学家之一,有望获得诺贝尔奖;一段据称与年轻女同事的不当性关系;以及一种政治和制度环境——在这种环境中,惩罚一个被指控性骚扰的男人,无论指控是否属实,都能提升毁掉被指控者职业生涯和声誉的个人和/或机构的职业前景和声誉。 由于Knouse的指控、Lehmann的虚假调查以及随之而来的媒体狂轰滥炸,David失去了所有收入来源,声誉被毁。他此前获得的所有奖项都被撤销。他被免去了所有科学顾问及其他荣誉职务,唯一例外是我们家族基金会(Pershing Square Foundation)科学顾问委员会的成员身份。 当我在2021年夏天最初得知David的消息时,我聘请他担任Pershing Square Foundation的顾问,因为我相信我们这个小基金会团队会从他的洞见中大为受益(而且他现在有时间帮助我们了),同时他也需要钱来养家。 在我的要求下,并依据一份保密协议,David向我们提供了数百页文件,包括他与Knouse的短信及其他通讯、调查报告,以及David对各项指控的回应,以便我们自己对Knouse的说法进行评估。 我和我们家族办公室法律团队的一名成员仔细审阅了这些文件。在仔细审阅了实证文件——尤其是Knouse与David之间的短信——之后,事情变得再清楚不过:Knouse的行为是一个愤怒的、被抛弃的恋人所为,而非一个遭到性骚扰的初级同事所为。而那份调查报告看起来更像是为了得出一个预先定好的结论,而非一份冷静的、基于事实的分析。 被解雇以及职业生涯和声誉被毁对David及其家人造成的打击极其毁灭性,以至于我们越来越担心他可能会自杀。 [为了确保David重要的科学研究能够继续,2023年2月,我们与一位匿名捐赠者合作,出资2500万美元支持David建立一个新的实验室。正如你所料,我因此遭到了媒体、科学期刊和社交媒体的猛烈抨击,因为我支持了一个所谓的性犯罪者。] 2021年10月20日,David对Knouse提起诉讼,指控其诽谤以及对其职业生涯和合同安排进行侵权干预。此后,Knouse对David提出了反诉。 今天,距离诉讼提起将近整整五年,他终于得到了正义。 今天,一个由David Sabatini的13名同侪组成的陪审团(七男六女,12名陪审员加1名候补)一致认定,David证明了Kristin Knouse对他进行了诽谤、侵权干预了他的合同关系(他作为科学家的整个职业生涯),以及侵权干预了他的预期有利关系(他未来的就业)。陪审团判给他近1000万美元的损害赔偿,包括利息。 陪审团驳回了Knouse的所有主张,包括她声称David实施了交换式性骚扰并制造了性敌意工作环境的说法。 虽然五年是一段在名誉阴影下度过的漫长时间,但今天正义终于为David得到了伸张——不过在我看来,并不彻底。 时至今日,Ruth Lehmann博士仍然是Whitehead研究所的所长。Lehmann博士与Knouse博士联手毁掉了David Sabatini——一位备受赞誉的科学家和教授。她在蓄意毁掉David的职业生涯和声誉之前,没有遵循正当程序。 Lehmann博士的行为几乎害死了David,因为如果我们没有通过为他找到工作、公开支持他以缓冲名誉损害、并支持他康复来拯救他,他可能早已结束自己的生命,让他的儿子在世人了解这里发生了什么之前就失去父亲。 而且,名誉损害不仅仅是对David的。 David的兄弟Bernardo Sabatini是世界上最杰出的神经科学家之一。时至今日,他仍然不得不面对笼罩在其家族姓氏和声誉上的巨大阴影。最近,当我们脑研究所的新任CEO提到Bernardo Sabatini在我们董事会任职时,有人问道:“他不是卷入了某种性丑闻吗?” 出于显而易见的原因,一个科学研究所领导者的品格至关重要。在此事的诸多失职之中,Ruth Lehmann博士在调查甚至尚未启动之前数月就向Knouse承诺她会解雇David,且未考虑实证事实。 如果一个科学研究所的领导者不愿在得出具有生命攸关影响的结论之前坚持观察实证事实,人们又如何能信任该研究所产出的研究成果?不幸的是,我们已经看到了大量科学造假,损害了无数人的生命,浪费了数十亿美元的研究经费和时间。 鉴于她在此事中的道德失范,Lehmann博士应该被Whitehead解雇。基于她在此案中的行为,她完全没有资格担任一个重要科学研究所的领导者。 我谈这个话题是有一定发言权的——关于科学及其他机构应该如何领导。包括最近成立的Ackman Oxman Institute在内,过去十年左右我们资助了大约10亿美元的科学研究和机构,这段经历让我们有机会结识世界上许多最重要科学机构的领导层。 说白了,我们不会给一个其领导者像本案这样违背基本道德原则的科学研究所一分钱。 至少,Whitehead的董事会应该立即对Lehmann博士在Sabatini案中的行为展开详细而独立的调查。我鼓励调查除其他事项外,仔细审查Lehmann与Knouse之间的所有通信,以及他们与HAS律师事务所之间关于Sabatini调查报告各版本等各方面的通信。 或者,Lehmann博士可以辞职,尽量减少对Whitehead的进一步干扰,节省本应更好地用于造福人类的研究的机构时间和资源。
2400多名纽约人实时收听了@SarithaForNY 纽约州总检察长候选人回答提问。关心如何让纽约摆脱犯罪、浪费、欺诈和滥用的人,必听。 选出Saritha,是你为打造一个更美好、更安全的城市所能做的最有力的一件事。
I am hosting an @X Space tomorrow at 5pm ET where I will interview @sarithaforny followed by open mic Q&A. Saritha is by far the most qualified candidate for AG. Listen to her for five minutes and you will understand why. x.com/i/spaces/1qKVmyPnwrAxB
查看被引用的帖子提醒一下。五分钟后开始。
I am hosting an @X Space tomorrow at 5pm ET where I will interview @sarithaforny followed by open mic Q&A. Saritha is by far the most qualified candidate for AG. Listen to her for five minutes and you will understand why. x.com/i/spaces/1qKVmyPnwrAxB
查看被引用的帖子我今晚美东时间5点在X上采访Saritha @sarithaforny。欢迎加入我们。 要让纽约更安全、更宜居,我们能做的最有意义的一件事,就是选出一位致力于打击犯罪的检察官。 @NYPDPC 很棒,但当罪犯被放回街头时,他们就无法履行职责。
The tough cases need a tough prosecutor – and that’s why I’m running for Attorney General.
查看被引用的帖子明天美东时间下午5点,我要在 @X Space 上主持一场直播,先采访 @sarithaforny,然后是自由问答环节。 Saritha 绝对是总检察长一职最有资格的候选人。听她讲五分钟,你就明白为什么了。 x.com/i/spaces/1qKVmyPnwrAxB
真的
Marc Andreessen reveals why housing, health care, and education keep getting more expensive while everything else gets cheaper "There's basically three components to the American dream. A house near great job opportunities, great health care for you and your family, and sending your kids to good schools" "If you disaggregate the economy over the last 25 years, everything that technology touches basically collapses in price. Television sets, computer games, anything with electronics in it. But if you chart housing, education, and health care, the prices of those things are skyrocketing" "The government restricts supply, zoning laws and university certifications. And then the government responds to the political pressure caused by the rising prices by subsidizing demand. And of course, if you subsidize demand and a fixed supply, you get skyrocketing prices"
查看被引用的帖子Ben Shapiro 谈种族灭绝指控。
WOW. Holy shit. The best response to Palestinian bullshit ever. Meticulous. Masterclass by @benshapiro You’ve gotta watch this
查看被引用的帖子一位法国人写的,关于我们如何避免美国变成法国的重要文章。
My post about France went viral. Thousands of likes. Many Americans told me: "Democrats aren't socialists. America will never be France." I want to answer that seriously, step by step. Start with a simple observation. Look at what has gotten cheaper in America over the last 25 years: TVs, phones, software, clothes, toys. Now look at what has exploded: college tuition, healthcare, childcare, housing. What separates the two lists? The first lives in competitive markets. The second is exactly where government is most involved: subsidies, mandates, licensing, zoning, regulation. College. Washington lends students almost unlimited money. Universities know the money will always come, so they raise tuition and hire more administrators. The student pays the bill for twenty years. More government money, higher prices. Housing. Why can't a nurse buy a home in the city where she works? Not because of capitalism. Because of zoning laws, permits, environmental reviews, years of procedure to build a single building. The most expensive places to live in America are the places where it's hardest to build. When building is nearly illegal, prices explode. Healthcare. The patient almost never sees the price. A third party pays, regulations limit who can compete, and costs climb year after year with no one able to say no. So here is the trap. The problems you suffer from are not the failure of free markets. They are the places where the market has already been replaced by the state. And the solution you're being offered is more of the same. That's the Trojan horse. It always works the same way. A real problem. A generous-sounding promise. A program that makes things worse. Then the failure of that program becomes the argument for the next one. People who lived under communism in Poland learned to recognize the lie and the mask the lie wears. The lie never presents itself as a lie. It presents itself as compassion. In France we are at the end of that road. Debt we can never repay. Young people who can't afford a home. Our best people leaving. And every few years our cities burn. Nobody voted for this. They voted for one more generous promise, fifty years in a row. If you're a Republican, share this with the Democrat in your life. Not to win an argument. To start a conversation. If you're a Democrat, I'm not asking you to switch teams. I'm asking you to look at the pattern. Wherever the state took over, life became unaffordable. Don't fix the failures of government with more government. Stay American. Ask for less state, not more.
查看被引用的帖子为了进一步了解Lucy的脑部康复与恢复情况,我们参观了位于纽约州White Plains的Burke Rehabilitation。我们一位家人朋友最近在这里从一场严重的脑出血中实现了惊人的康复。 我们参观了Burke的园区,见了他们的团队,印象很深。不过我们也注意到,Burke的资源严重不足。简而言之,由于缺乏资源,我们对Burke以及全美其他康复中心的脑损伤患者做得还远远不够。 为了帮助推动Burke的发展,Neri和我承诺提供一笔2000万美元的挑战性配捐。Burke每筹集到一笔新资金,我们将以最高2000万美元的捐赠基金进行等额配捐,该基金将由我们为中心管理。 如果你想为这项事业出一份力,请点击以下链接: burke.org/giving/unlock-possible/ Burke Rehab的视频可以在这里观看: youtube.com/watch?v=xPxcKXxI_uM
伊朗问题上说得对。
🔥 Now this is how you field the questiond about the war in Iran. The crowd's response is epic. GOP Senatorial candidate Justin Murphy's response was pure gold. Senator Cory "Spartacus" Booker's face tells the entire story as Democrats have seen no one come Out swinging like this. "Mr. President, put your cowboy hat on and get out there and kick some a$$...and get this done and get this done right"
查看被引用的帖子
